Eleven high worldwide habit scientists argue that the 2022 assertion on e-cigarettes issued by Australia’s peak well being and medical physique, the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council (NHMRC), fails to fulfill the excessive scientific normal anticipated of a number one nationwide scientific physique.
The NHMRC assertion, revealed in June 2022, goals to supply “public well being recommendation on the security and impacts of digital cigarettes (e-cigarettes) based mostly on evaluate of the present proof.”
This critique of the NHMRC assertion, revealed within the journal Dependancy, argues that the assertion doesn’t precisely summarize the present proof on e-cigarettes. Actually, it selectively cites proof in help of a 2017 assertion relatively than objectively analyzing and incorporating new analysis. The critique additionally argues that the NHMRC assertion depends closely on a flawed evaluation by the Nationwide Centre for Epidemiology and Public Well being on the Australian Nationwide College.
The authors of the critique cite the next weaknesses of the NHMRC assertion:
- It exaggerates the dangers of vaping and fails to match them with smoking.
- It incorrectly claims that adolescent vaping causes subsequent smoking.
- It ignores proof of the advantages of vaping in serving to people who smoke give up.
- It ignores proof that vaping is probably going already having a optimistic impact on public well being.
- It misapplies the precautionary precept, which requires coverage makers to match the dangers of introducing a product with the dangers of delaying its introduction.
In accordance with lead creator Dr. Colin Mendelsohn, “Many main worldwide scientists within the area maintain extra supportive views than the NHMRC on the potential of e-cigarettes as a method to enhance public well being. Specifically, invoking the precautionary precept to forestall using a lot much less dangerous smoke-free merchandise is unjustified within the face of the large public well being burden of smoking.”
In sum, argue the authors of this critique, the NHMRC assertion confuses affiliation with causation, adopts a double normal by uncritically accepting proof of harms whereas being extremely skeptical of proof of advantages, and inappropriately applies the precautionary precept.
A critique of the Australian NHMRC CEO Assertion on digital cigarettes., Dependancy (2023). DOI: 10.1111/add.16143
Society for the Research of Dependancy
Dependancy researchers denounce Australia’s NHMRC assertion on e-cigarettes (2023, February 20)
retrieved 20 February 2023
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any truthful dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.